检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]重庆市沙坪坝区人民医院护理部,重庆400030 [2]重庆医科大学第二附属医院内分泌科
出 处:《西南国防医药》2014年第9期935-938,共4页Medical Journal of National Defending Forces in Southwest China
基 金:国家自然科学基金(30971388)
摘 要:目的探讨协同干预模式对胰岛素联合格列美脲治疗糖尿病患者的影响。方法将106例胰岛素联合格列美脲治疗糖尿病患者随机分为观察组和对照组各53例,对照组给予常规干预模式,观察组在此基础上实施协同干预模式。结果干预前两组依从性、空腹血糖、餐后2 h血糖及糖化血红蛋白水平比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预后观察组治疗依从性明显优于对照组,空腹血糖、餐后2 h血糖及糖化血红蛋白水平均明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论协同干预模式的实施,有助于提高胰岛素联合格列美脲治疗糖尿病患者的治疗依从性和疗效。Objective To explore the impact of collaborative intervention on patients with diabetes in the treatment of insulin combined with glimepiride.Methods 106 patients with diabetes in the treatment of insulin combined with glimepiride were randomly divided into 2 groups:observation group and control group,53 in each; routine intervention was performed in both groups,while collaborative intervention was added to patients in observation group.Results Before intervention,there was no significant difference in compliance,the levels of fast blood glucose (FBG),blood glucose of post prandial 2 hours (2hBG) and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1 c)between the 2 groups(P > 0.05),while after intervention,the compliance of the patients in observation group was superior to that of the patients in control group and the levels of FBG,2hBG and HbA1 c were significantly lower than those of the patients in control group(P < 0.05).Conclusions The performance of collaborative intervention is of help in improving the compliance of the patients with diabetes in the treatment of insulin combined with glimepiride and can gain a better curative effect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.166