检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:庞建红 汪小华[2] 赵黎[3] 傅雪琴[4] 姜小梅[5] 仇静波[2] 许义[2] 汪年松[3]
机构地区:[1]江苏盛泽医院护理部,苏州市215228 [2]苏州大学护理学院 [3]上海市交通大学附属第六人民医院肾内科 [4]浙江大学医学院附属邵逸夫医院肾内科 [5]苏州大学附属第二医院肾内科
出 处:《中国护理管理》2014年第8期826-830,共5页Chinese Nursing Management
基 金:苏州市科技计划项目(SYS201310)
摘 要:目的:发展适用于持续非卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)患者自我管理的测评量表并进行信、效度检验。方法:查阅文献并结合患者访谈,发展条目池;经两轮德尔菲(Delphi)专家评定和预试验,形成包含5个因子44个条目的初始量表;调查江浙沪地区"三甲"医院的313例CAPD患者,评价量表的信、效度。结果:探索性因素分析得到含有28个条目的5个公因子:换液技术操作、操作中异常情况的处理、饮食管理、并发症监测、情绪管理及社会回归。累积解释变异率为64.567%,量表内容效度指数为0.963,Cronbach’sα系数为0.926,奇偶折半系数为0.960,重测信度系数为0.937。结论:本量表具有良好的信、效度,适用于CAPD患者自我管理能力的评价。Objective: To develop and evaluate the scale of self-management for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis(CAPD) patients. Methods: The item pool was formulated based on literature review and in-depth interviews. An initial scale containing 5 dimensions and 44 items was constructed through two rounds of Delphi expert consultation and preliminary test. Totally 313 CAPD patients from Jiangsu-Zhejiang-Shanghai area were investigated to test the reliability and validity of the scale. Results: Five factors, including technical operations of liquid replacement, solution for unusual situation, diet management, complications monitoring, emotional regulation and social participation, were extracted by exploratory factor analysis; the 28 items could explain 64.567% of the total variance. The content validity index, Cronbach's α coefficient, split-half coefficient and test-retest reliability was 0.963, 0.926, 0.960 and 0.937 respectively. Conclusion: The scale is supported to be a reliable and valid tool for the self-management assessment of CAPD patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.185