教育认知诊断测验的信度和效度研究评述  

A Review of Reliability and Validity Indices in Cognitive Diagnostic Assessments

作　　者：汪文义[1] 宋丽红[2] 丁树良[1] 

机构地区：[1]江西师范大学计算机信息工程学院 [2]江西师范大学初等教育学院

出　　处：《考试研究》2014年第5期29-36,28,共9页Examinations Research

基　　金：国家自然科学基金(30860084;31160203;31100756;31360237);国家社会科学基金(12BYY055);国家教育科学规划项目(CCA110109);教育部人文社科项目(09JJCXLX012;10YJCXLX049;11YJC190002);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(13YJC880060);江西省社会科学研究"十二五"(2012年)规划项目(12JY07);江西省教育科学2013年度一般课题(13YB032);江西省教育厅科技计划项目(GJJ11385;GJJ10238;GJJ13207;GJJ13226);全国教育考试科研规划课题(2009JKS2009);高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(20113604110001);江西师范大学青年成长基金的资助

摘　　要：信度和效度是衡量一个测量工具质量的关键指标,教育认知诊断测验中的信度和效度研究近年来受到研究者的关注。诊断测验的信度系数基本上源自基于α系数的属性信度系数、经验属性信度系数、四分相关系数、模拟重测一致性和分类一致性指标;效度系数主要包括模拟判准率、分类准确性和理论构想效度等。教育认知诊断测验的信度和效度研究较新,仍存在着一定的不足且缺乏全面的比较研究,更缺少系统的评价体系。Reliability and validity can be used as important indicators of precision and accuracy of classification results produced by cognitive diagnostic assessments. Reliability and validity of diagnostic scores are often not reported,so that examinees and users of test results are not informed of the degree to which confidence it can be placed in attribute classifications. The study mainly gives a review of the reliability and validity indices in CDA.There have some work being done recently on the reliability measures for the categorical latent variables of diagnostic classification models（ Templin Bradshaw,2013）,the reliability of attribute- based scoring in cognitive diagnostic models（ Gierl,Cui, Zhou,2009）,classification consistency and accuracy indices specifically designed for cognitive diagnostic assessments（ Cui,Gierl, Chang,2012） and so on. In addition,Ding et,al.,（ 2012）proposed a theoretical construct validity index to evaluate the theoretical validity of cognitive diagnostic testing. Some limitations and further directions about these indices are also presented.

关 键 词：属性信度 经验信度 分类一致性 分类准确性 理论构想效度 

分 类 号：G424.74[文化科学—课程与教学论]