制度质量、制度距离与中国文化创意产品出口  

Institutional Quality, Institutional Distance and China's Cultural Products Exports

作　　者：许陈生[1] 游芬[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东外语外贸大学,广州510006

出　　处：《广东外语外贸大学学报》2014年第4期36-40,共5页Journal of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies

基　　金：教育部创新团队发展计划"中国参与全球经济治理机制与战略选择"(IRT1224);国家自然科学基金青年项目(71303063);教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(11JZD021);教育部人文社会科学青年项目(11YJC630241)资助

摘　　要：本文以实证方法探讨了进口国或地区制度质量与制度距离对中国文化创意产品出口贸易的影响。以2002-2010年中国对42个国家或地区的文化创意产品出口数据为样本,研究发现,总体上,制度质量与制度距离对中国文化创意产品出口贸易存在显著的促进作用,但不同制度维度的影响存在差异。其中,微观经济制度质量、宏观经济制度质量、法律制度距离和宏观经济制度距离均为积极影响,法律制度质量和微观经济制度距离则为消极影响。进一步,根据制度质量高低分组研究发现,在低制度质量进口国或地区,制度质量和制度距离的影响均显著为负;在高制度质量进口国或地区,制度质量、制度距离的影响均显著为正。这表明制度质量和制度距离对中国文化创意产品的出口贸易效应受进口国或地区特征条件约束。Based on the panel data of China’s exports of cultural creative products to 42 countries from 2002 to 2010, this paper examines the effect of institutional quality and institutional distance of the importing countries on China’s exports of cultural creative products. It is observed that the exports of cultural products are positively affected by institutional quality and distance. The results come out to be different in three aspects. The institutional quality of law proves to correlate negatively with cultural exports, while the institutional quality of micro-economy and macro-economy to be adverse. The institutional distance of micro-economy will hinder the exports of cultural products and that of law and macro-economy will promote the exports. With dividing the sample countries into low-institutional and high-institutional quality group, it is found that in the low-institutional quality countries, institutional quality and institutional distance are negatively significant, while these are positively significant in the high-institutional quality countries.

关 键 词：制度质量 制度距离 文化创意产品 出口 

分 类 号：F752.62[经济管理—国际贸易]