检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]新疆医科大学第二附属医院泌尿外科,新疆乌鲁木齐830063 [2]新疆医科大学第一附属医院泌尿外科,新疆乌鲁木齐830054
出 处:《现代预防医学》2014年第18期3433-3434,3438,共3页Modern Preventive Medicine
基 金:国家自然科学基金号(81060210)
摘 要:目的通过比较肾癌最大直径的B超、CT测量值与病理测量值间的统计学差异,探讨此差异对保留肾单位手术的影响。方法自2008年10月至2011年5月348例肾癌患者中符合入选标准者324例,回顾性分析肾癌最大直径的B超、CT测量值及病理实测值,对资料进行正态分布检验、方差齐性检验、t检验、线性相关分析。结果 B超及CT测量的肾癌最大直径值与病理实测值间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论肾癌最大直径的B超及CT测量值与病理实测值间不存在统计学差异,以B超或者CT测量值作为保留肾单位应用指征标准的安全性良好。Objective The purpose of this study was to discuss whether statistical differences existed among type-B ultrasound, CT and pathological examination for the renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and to investigate the corresponding influence to nephron sparing surgery. Methods Three hundred and twenty-four cases of qualified RCC cases were collected in the retrospective study. The data of type-B ultrasound, CT and pathological measured maximum diameter of the renal cell carcinoma were collected and used for statistical test of normal distribution, homogeneity of variance, t test and linear correlation analysis were performed. Results The type-B ultrasound, CT and pathological measured maximum diameters of the renal cell carcinoma had no statistical differences (P〉0.05). Conclusion The statistical differences among type-B ultrasound, CT and pathological examinations for the renal cell carcinoma does not exist.The type-B ultrasonic and CT, is safe to be used as the standard measurement for the nephron sparing surgery.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.132.213.245