肾癌术后病理标本与术前B超及CT测量值的差异研究  

Analysis on the differences of type-B ultrasonic, CT and pathological examination for renal cell carcinoma

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:张涛[1] 王玉杰[2] 

机构地区:[1]新疆医科大学第二附属医院泌尿外科,新疆乌鲁木齐830063 [2]新疆医科大学第一附属医院泌尿外科,新疆乌鲁木齐830054

出  处:《现代预防医学》2014年第18期3433-3434,3438,共3页Modern Preventive Medicine

基  金:国家自然科学基金号(81060210)

摘  要:目的通过比较肾癌最大直径的B超、CT测量值与病理测量值间的统计学差异,探讨此差异对保留肾单位手术的影响。方法自2008年10月至2011年5月348例肾癌患者中符合入选标准者324例,回顾性分析肾癌最大直径的B超、CT测量值及病理实测值,对资料进行正态分布检验、方差齐性检验、t检验、线性相关分析。结果 B超及CT测量的肾癌最大直径值与病理实测值间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论肾癌最大直径的B超及CT测量值与病理实测值间不存在统计学差异,以B超或者CT测量值作为保留肾单位应用指征标准的安全性良好。Objective The purpose of this study was to discuss whether statistical differences existed among type-B ultrasound, CT and pathological examination for the renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and to investigate the corresponding influence to nephron sparing surgery. Methods Three hundred and twenty-four cases of qualified RCC cases were collected in the retrospective study. The data of type-B ultrasound, CT and pathological measured maximum diameter of the renal cell carcinoma were collected and used for statistical test of normal distribution, homogeneity of variance, t test and linear correlation analysis were performed. Results The type-B ultrasound, CT and pathological measured maximum diameters of the renal cell carcinoma had no statistical differences (P〉0.05). Conclusion The statistical differences among type-B ultrasound, CT and pathological examinations for the renal cell carcinoma does not exist.The type-B ultrasonic and CT, is safe to be used as the standard measurement for the nephron sparing surgery.

关 键 词:肾癌 B超 CT 保留肾单位手术 

分 类 号:R816.5[医药卫生—放射医学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象