服务贸易进口下的知识产权保护最适强度研究  

Research on Optimal Strength of Intellectual Property Rights Protection for Imports in Services

作　　者：唐保庆[1] 仲崇高[2] 王绮[3] 

机构地区：[1]南京财经大学江苏产业发展研究院 [2]东南大学经济管理学院 [3]武警北京指挥学院

出　　处：《统计研究》2014年第10期43-48,共6页Statistical Research

基　　金：国家自然科学基金青年项目"知识产权保护影响现代服务业发展的传导机制及政策强度综合平衡研究"(71203099);国家社会科学基金青年项目"知识产权贸易对我国实施创新驱动战略的影响及政策研究"(13CJY099);教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目"服务贸易进口影响经济增长的传导机制研究:知识产权保护视角"(12YJC790171)资助

摘　　要：本文从知识产权保护视角出发,阐述了服务贸易进口影响全要素生产率(TFP)增长的传导机制,运用中国和OECD国家的数据研究了服务贸易进口对TFP增长的影响,并且计算出TFP增长所需要的知识产权保护最适强度。结果表明:1劳动密集型、资本密集型服务贸易进口无助于促进全要素生产率增长,技术与知识密集型服务贸易进口则显著地促进了全要素生产率增长,即使考虑了知识产权保护因素,这一结果依然不变;2中国当前的知识产权保护实际强度低于国内R&D投入、技术与知识密集型服务贸易进口所需要的最适强度,但OECD国家已经超过了最适强度;3中国国内R&D投入所需要的最适强度低于技术与知识密集型服务贸易进口所需要的最适强度。This paper illustrates the transmission mechanisms of imports in services influencing growth of TFP, empirically researches the effect of imports in services on TFP with data for China and OECD, calculates the optimal strength of IPRs for TFP growth, and draws conclusions as follows. Firstly, labor-intensive and capital-intensive imports in services don＇ t contribute to TFP growth, but technology-intensive imports in services promote TFP growth significantly, and these results keep constant when IPRs are taken into consideration. Secondly, the currently actual strength of IPRs in China is lower than the optimal strength of IPRs needed by domestic R＆D and technology-intensive imports in services, but it＇ s the opposite case in OECD. Thirdly, the optimal strength of IPRs needed by domestic R＆D is lower than that needed by technology-intensive imports in services.

关 键 词：服务贸易进口 全要素生产率增长 知识产权保护 最适强度 

分 类 号：C812[社会学—统计学]