门控心血池显像评估右心室功能的价值  

Value of gated blood pool imaging in assessing right ventricular function

作　　者：赵骏[1] 刘剑文[1] 芮逸飞[2] 颜紫宁[2] 范莉[2] 徐龙宝[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京医科大学附属常州市第二人民医院核医学科,江苏省213000 [2]南京医科大学附属常州市第二人民医院心超室,江苏省213000

出　　处：《江苏医药》2014年第19期2281-2283,共3页Jiangsu Medical Journal

摘　　要：目的探讨门控心血池显像(GBPI)评估右心室功能的价值。方法 20例心脏病患者1周内均行GBPI(A组)和实时三维超声心动图(B组)检查,比较两组右心室射血分数(RVEF)、右心室舒张末期容量(RVEDV)和右心室收缩末期容量(RVESV),并进行相关性分析和Bland-Altam一致性检验。结果 A组RVEDV和RVESV均大于B组[(113.85±37.00)ml vs.(93.48±43.28)ml和(64.50±19.38)ml vs.(49.27±16.73)ml](P<0.05)。A、B组RVEF、RVEDV和RVESV均有良好相关性(r=0.739、r=0.780、r=0.702,P<0.01)。两组RVEF一致性较好。结论 GBPI是一种安全简便的评价右心室功能的方法。Objective To explore the value of gated blood pool imaging（GBPI） in assessing right ventricular function. Methods Twenty patients with heart disease were examined by both GBPI （group A） and real-time 3-dimentional echocardiography （group B）. The right ventricular ejection fraction（RVEF）, right ventricular end-diastolic volume （RVEDV） and right ventricular end-systolic volume（RVESV） were compared. The correlation analysis and Bland-Aham consistency test were performed between two groups. Results RVEDV and RVESV were larger in group A than those in group B [（113.85±37. 00） ml vs. （93.48±43.28） ml and （64. 50±19.38） ml vs. （49. 27±16.73） ml] （P〈0. 05）. The RVEF, RVEDV and RVESV were well correlated each other in two groups （r=0.739, r= 0. 780, r= 0. 702, P〈0.01 ）. Two groups had better consistency in RVEF. Conclusion GBPI is a safe and convenient method in assessing right ventricular function.

关 键 词：门控心血池显像 右心室 实时三维超声心动图 

分 类 号：R817[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学]