检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国人民公安大学公安情报学系,北京100038
出 处:《安徽行政学院学报》2014年第5期11-14,共4页Journal of Anhui Academy of Governance
基 金:北京市哲学社会科学规划项目"北京市政府信息公开热点问题研究"(12SKD038);中国人民公安大学科研载体培养项目"公安情报信息保密审查问题研究"(2014JKF01059)
摘 要:政府信息公开保密审查是保密审查一个重要领域,作为政府信息公开建设的核心制度,在工作中起到"缓冲剂"、"平衡阀"、"过滤器"作用。我国现行的法律规范提出建立政府信息公开保密审查的普遍性要求和一般性原则,但对于怎样建立此制度没有具体规定,客观上造成保密审查主体扩大、标准模糊、监督不力等问题。对此,文章提出进一步具体明确保密审查标准、严格限定保密审查主体、将保密审查与解密审查结合起来、建立健全保密审查的内部监督机制等建议。The confidentiality review of government information disclosure system is an important field of confidentiality review. As the core system of government information disclosure construction,confidentiality review plays the role of buffer agent,balance valve or filter. The current laws and regulations in our country proposed to establish universal requirements and general principles. However,how to establish this system has not been specified,which has caused many problems objectively,such as the expanding subjects of confidentiality review,the blurry standard,the ineffective supervision and so on. Therefore,this article suggests to define the standard of confidentiality review,limit the subjects of confidentiality review strictly,combine confidentiality review with decrypt review,establish and strengthen the internal supervision system and so on,hoping to provide some references for consummating the system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28