检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:于志刚[1]
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学,北京100088
出 处:《现代法学》2014年第5期170-184,共15页Modern Law Science
基 金:中国政法大学优秀中青年教师培养支持计划资助项目;2011年教育部哲学社会科学研究后期资助项目"中国犯罪记录制度的体系构建"(11JHQ014)
摘 要:刑事裁判文书公开经历了从不公开到有限公开再到当前的全面实名网络公开三个阶段,成为近期司法改革的重点和标志。犯罪人的身份信息兼具公共属性和私权性质,而当前司法改革未能准确把握其法律性质和法律评价,在制度设计时,忽视了对犯罪人隐私权的保护,混淆了规范性评价和非规范性评价各自的特征和功能,使刑事裁判文书公开的正当性出现了欠缺,不仅削弱了刑事裁判文书公开应有的促进司法完善的效果,而且成为未来的中国犯罪记录制度建构的重大阻碍,成为刑事法治完善进程中的不和谐因素。尽快对当前刑事裁判文书网络化公开的改革举措进行调整,在公布的刑事裁判文书中隐匿犯罪人的姓名,并以此为契机,推动中国犯罪记录制度的建构,是未来司法改革完善的重要工作。Criminal judgment has been developed from being classified to being limited open, and now to real-name and all-sided openness online, becoming the highlight of recent judicial reform. Perpetrator' s identi- fication possesses both the characteristics of public attributes and private right. Due to the misunderstanding of the private right' s nature in law and law evaluation in current judicial reform, perpetrator' s private fight has been so ignored that confusing the normative evaluations and non-normative evaluations when designing the law system, and the criminal judgment is being challenged, which has not only undermined its original function of improving the law system but also impeded the construction of Chinese future criminal law development, becom- ing negative factors when improving Chinese criminal law system as well. The judicial reforms of criminal judg- ment, in which perpetrators' name are hided and so as to build Chinese criminal record system, are required when improving Chinese future law system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38