检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王思锋[1]
出 处:《法学杂志》2014年第10期42-51,共10页Law Science Magazine
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目"不动产财产准征收理论与实证研究"(11BFX067)的阶段性成果
摘 要:伴随着财产法律制度的发展变革,传统财产征收理论也在逐渐发生着变化。我国的财产征收制度经历了由计划性征收到市场性征收,由财产征用到征收、征用并存的发展演变,目前不仅存在着基本概念不清、征收目的偏离公共利益、政府滥用行政征收权等普遍性问题,尤其是对于财产权过度限制之现状缺乏应有的关注和规范,致使公民私有财产权常常遭受过度限制或者长期侵占而得不到法律救济。因此,学界应该以不动产准征收制度的建立为契机,直面我国财产征收的现实问题,将重构中国财产征收法律制度、制定《中华人民共和国征收法》作为当前财产法研究的中心任务。There is legitimacy for government to collect property directly based on public right,which has been affirmed by constitution in modern countries. During the reform and development of property legal system,traditional property collection theory also has endured constantly changes. Property collection system has changed from planed collection to market collection in China,and evolution from expropriation to the coexistence of collection and expropriation. Now,there have universal problems like unclear definition,deviated public interest and governmental abuse on administrative collection right,and also the situation for lack of due attention and rules to exceeding limitation to property rights that the individual private property cannot get due legal relief due to exceeding limitation and longtime invaded. Therefore,the scholars shall face directly the property collection reality in China by taking the establishment of Inverse Condemnation of Real Estate,and reconstruct the property collection legal system in China and Property Collection Law of PRC that take as the core of present property law research.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.89