“情节较轻”的认定应不考虑法定从宽情节——以防卫过当故意杀人行为的量刑为切入  

The Legal Circumstances for Lenient Sentencing should not be Considered when Identifying the Lighter Circumstance:through the Sentencing Criterion for Intentional Homicide Behavior which is Caused by Excessive Defense

作　　者：付立庆[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学刑事法律科学研究中心,北京100872

出　　处：《法学杂志》2014年第10期66-72,共7页Law Science Magazine

摘　　要：在防卫过当而故意杀人的场合,能否直接认定为故意杀人罪的"情节较轻"有不同的理解。肯定说可能会导致重复评价,而否定说可能导致防卫过当"免除处罚"的规定大打折扣。在将防卫过当细分为质的过当与量的过当、针对严重不法侵害的过当与针对一般不法侵害的过当的前提下,就会发现防卫过当的故意杀人既可能是"情节较轻"也可能不是,此即本文的"二分说"主张。判断是否"情节较轻",不能以存在法定的从宽情节甚至是减轻情节为基础,而恰恰只能根据具体案件中的主客观情况,具体地加以判断。In the case when the intentional homicide behavior is caused by excessive defense,people have different understanding for whether this behavior could be identified as the lighter circumstance directly. The positive opinion may violate the principle of prohibition repeatable evaluations,whereas the negative opinion may reduce the utility of the rules that the justifiable defense be exempted from punishment. Excessive defense could be classified as qualitative excess and quantitive excess. Also,excessive defense could against the serious unlawful infringement and the general unlawful infringement. On this premise,we can find that whether the intentional homicide behavior caused by excessive defense can be identified as relatively light circumstance is depends. This is the proposition of the article. Determining whether the circumstance is relatively light should not be based on the attenuating circumstance or the mitigating circumstance. The basis of the judgment should be the subjective and objective conditions of the case.

关 键 词：防卫过当 情节较轻 双重评价 

分 类 号：D924.13[政治法律—刑法学]