检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]复旦大学附属华东医院,200040
出 处:《首都医药》2014年第20期28-29,共2页Capital Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨放射性核素骨(ECT)联合肿瘤标志物检测用于老年肺癌骨转移患者的临床诊断价值。方法选取本院2010年10月~2013年10月收治的138例老年肺癌患者为研究对象,根据肺癌患者骨转移与否,分为转移组和未转移组;其中未转移组54例,转移组84例;另选88例本院同期收治的肺部良性疾病患者为对照组。分析患者的临床资料,对比分析患者ECT显像和肿瘤标志物检测结果。结果转移组:CEA为(70.1±21.0)ng/ml, CYFRA21-1为(27.2±12.3)ng/ml,NSE为(39.9±11.6)U/ml,骨显像阳性81例;未转移组:CEA为(51.3±13.7)ng/ml,CYFRA21-1为(23.2±7.1)ng/ml, NSE为(40.2±10.8)U/ml,骨显像阳性8例;对照组:CEA为(12.4±3.2)ng/ml,CYFRA21-1为(4.4±2.5)ng/ml, NSE为(12.7±1.8)U/ml,骨显像阳性8例。结论 ECT联合肿瘤标志物检测对老年肺癌患者骨转移的诊断和治疗具有重要意义。Objective To explore the value of tumor marker and ECT in diagnosis of bone metastasis in elder lung cancers.Methods The 138 cases elder lung cancers were divided into metastasis group (84 cases) and un-metastasis group (54 cases), and 88 cases with optimum lung disease as control group. The results of ECT and tumor marker were analyzed. Results In metastasis group, CET was (70.1±21.0)ng/ml, CYFRA21-1was (27.2±12.3) ng/ml, NSE was (39.9±11.6) U/ml and 81 cases with positive ECT. In un-metastasis group, CET was (51.3±13.7)ng/ml, CYFRA21-1was (23.2±7.1) ng/ml, NSE was (40.2±10.8) U/ml and 8 cases with positive ECT. In control group, CET was (12.4±3.2) ng/ml, CYFRA21-1was (4.4±2.5) ng/ml, NSE was (12.7±1.8) U/ml and 8 cases with positive ECT.Conclusion It’s useful for diagnosis and treatment bone metastasis in elder lung cancers to test tumor marker and ECT.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.189.188.157