检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吕乃基[1]
机构地区:[1]东南大学科技与社会研究中心,江苏南京210096
出 处:《中国软科学》2014年第9期34-45,共12页China Soft Science
摘 要:大数据认识论的主体高度分化并社会化,对象是世界2在世界3的映射,技术手段会极大影响主体与对象的关系。大数据认识论一步达到传统认识论第一条道路的终点,引发"知其然而不知其所以然"之争。认识结果具有多样性和多重评价,并反作用于世界2。大数据认识论既是认识论,又是产业和实践论。大数据认识论的特点具有认识史和知识论依据。中国语境下的大数据实践论具有特别重要的意义。The subjects of big data epistemology are highly differentiated and socialized. The objects of big dataepistemology are a map of "World II" and "World III" put forward by Karl Popper. Technical means greatly affect therelationship between the subject and object of big data epistemology. Big data epistemology reaches the end of thetraditional epistemology with one step, which leads to a dispute of" know what but don't know why". The result of big dataepistemology is diverse and has multiple evaluations, and the result reacts to World II. Big data epistemology is not onlya kind of epistemology, but also a theory of industry and practice. Big data epistemology has its history and basis ofepistemology. The theory of practice of big data in the context of China has particular importance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.104