检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王艳慧[1]
出 处:《哈尔滨师范大学社会科学学报》2014年第4期33-38,共6页Journal of Social Science of Harbin Normal University
摘 要:关于代位继承的性质,理论界一直存在代位权说和固有权说两种观点。在继承法修订过程中,固有权说基本占据绝对优势。但固有权说并不能对代位继承的所有规范做出完满解释。溯源代位继承制度的原初规定有助于厘清学说论争,在继承人丧失继承权的情况下其子女不应当实行代位,但在继承人放弃继承权的情况下其子女可以实行代位。建立合理的制度架构应基于社会现实的需要,而不是根据学说界定。Subrogation inheritance as an important legal system,It originated from Rome law.About the nature of subrogation,there always has two points which were the inherent right or the right of subrogation in the theory.In the process of revising the law of succession,the inherent right is in the basic occupy absolute advantage.But the inherent right can not make a perfect interpretation for all norms of subrogation inheritance.The original provisions of subrogation inheritance system will helpsto clarify the theory debate.When the heir loss of the right of inheritance,their children should not make Implementation of subrogation.But children can be subrogationn the case of the heir to abandon the right of inheritance.The establishment of the system of reasonable structure should be according to the need of social reality,Not according to the theory definition.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.63