论我国期刊评价标准的利弊及改进措施  

The Study of the Pros and Cons of Journal Evaluation Standard in China and the Improvement Measures

作　　者：李恩昌[1,2] 刘书文[3,4] 

机构地区：[1]西安交通大学医学院 [2]<中国医学伦理学>杂志编辑部,陕西西安710061 [3]成都中医药大学 [4]<中国卫生事业管理>杂志社编辑部

出　　处：《中国卫生事业管理》2014年第10期797-799,共3页Chinese Health Service Management

摘　　要：我国期刊评价的五大体系,其评价标准大同小异,但都把期刊影响力做为核心期刊等的评价标准,主要包括影响因子、被引频次、索引量等。其促进了期刊质量的完善和发展,同时也为期刊带来了些不利因素,如使得期刊刊登文献与办刊宗旨偏离等。建议期刊评价增加学科忠诚度,在科技期刊评价体系中应把院士论文和基金论文合称重要论文比,或院士论文比作为科技期刊评价的一个单独评价指标。以使评价体系更具有科学性、公正性。There are five journal evaluation systems in China, with little varied evaluation standards, but the journal influ- ence is the common evaluation standard for core journals, such including impact factor, cited frequency, index frequency, etc. It promotes the perfection and development of journal quality, at the same time also brought some adverse factors, for example, pub- lished literatures deviating from the principle of journals. We suggested journals evaluation should increase discipline loyalty, im- portant literature ratio referring to academician and funding supported, or academician literature ratio is deemed as an individual indicator in evaluation in order to make the evaluation system more scientific and equitable.

关 键 词：期刊评价 影响力 学科忠诚度 重要论文比 院士论文比 

分 类 号：G255.2[文化科学—图书馆学]