转型期省际城市化效率格局演变与成因探析  

Evolution and Causes of Provincial Urbanization Efficiency Pattern during the Transition Period

作　　者：张荣天[1] 焦华富[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽师范大学国土资源与旅游学院,安徽芜湖241003

出　　处：《热带地理》2014年第5期627-634,共8页Tropical Geography

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究项目(10YJA790083)

摘　　要：以中国31个省域单元为例(未涉及港、澳、台地区),从城市投入和产出2个基本维度上建立效率指标体系,应用改进DEA模型计算2000―2012年的省际城市化效率;并通过空间自相关分析模型、效率重心模型等方法对转型期中国省际城市化效率格局演变及成因展开实证探讨。研究表明:1)2000年以来中国省际城市化效率区域不均衡性显著,东部地区主要表现为技术效率驱动模式,而中西部地区表现为规模效率驱动模式;2)2000―2012年省际城市化综合效率、技术效率及规模效率全局上均呈现出正的空间自相关性,而局部上综合效率及规模效率具有相似集聚演化特征;城市化综合效率与技术效率的重心主要向东南方向偏移,而规模效率的重心主要向西南方向偏移;3)区位条件及禀赋、产业结构差异、区域发展政策及其市场化水平是影响转型期省际城市化效率空间格局演变的主要成因。This paper took 31 provinces as the research object, constructed comprehensive measure urbanization efficiency index system. On the basis of ESDA-DEA spatial analysis framework, using spatial auto-correlation analysis （Moran’s I, Getis-Ord ＊iG ） and efficiency gravity model, the paper analyzed spatial pattern evolution and influence factors of provincial urbanization efficiency in China from 2000 to 2012. The study showed that： The malconformation of provincial urbanization efficiency was significant, the eastern region of China mainly performed technical efficiency drive mode, and the western region of China performed scale efficiency drive mode;Comprehensive, technical and scale urbanization efficiency showed positive spatial correlation characteristics, there existed spatial agglomeration phenomenon, comprehensive urbanization efficiency and scale efficiency of local hot spot group had the similar characteristics; The focus of comprehensive efficiency and technical efficiency was transferring to the southeast of China, while that of scale efficiency transferring to the southwest of China;Geographical location differences, industrial structure differences, regional development policy and the marketization level comprehensively drived provincial urbanization efficiency spatial pattern evolution.

关 键 词：城市化效率 格局演变 主要成因 转型期 

分 类 号：F293.2[经济管理—国民经济]