检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈峰[1] 徐国新[2] 袁晓薇[1] 曹伟伟[1] 丁培培[1] 周雅晨
机构地区:[1]南通出入境检验检疫局,江苏南通226005 [2]张家港市第一人民医院检验科,江苏张家港215600
出 处:《中国卫生检验杂志》2014年第18期2673-2674,共2页Chinese Journal of Health Laboratory Technology
摘 要:目的探讨前S1蛋白与乙肝(HBV)血清标志物检测在HBV感染中的临床意义。方法采用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)同时进行乙肝病毒前S1蛋白和HBV血清标志物检测,对比2种检测方法在乙肝检验和治疗中的价值。结果不同HBV感染模式下HBV-DNA检测总阳性率为66.71%,与前S1蛋白检测总阳性59.27%比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);前S1蛋白检测敏感性为81.9%明显高于HBeAg的55.03%(P<0.05),前S1蛋白检测准确性为83.54%高于HBeAg的66.83%(P<0.05)。结论前S1蛋白与HBV血清标志物的检测均能较好的反映乙肝病毒复制情况,前S1蛋白检测敏感性和准确性较高,两者联合测定能为HBV患者提供更为客观的诊断和治疗依据。Objective To discuss the clinical significance of pre- S1 protein and HBV serum marker in detecting HBV infection. Methods Using the enzyme linked immunosorbent assay( ELISA) and detecting the pre- S1 protein and HBV serum marker at the same time. Values of the 2 kinds of detection methods in inspection and treatment of HVB were compared. Results Under different HBV infection modes,total positive rate of HBV- DNA detection was 66. 71% obviously higher than pre- S1 protein detection 59. 27%. The difference has statistical significance( P〈0. 05). Sensitivity of pre- S1 protein detection was 81. 9% obviously higher than HBeAg 55. 03%( P〈0. 05). Accuracy of pre- S1 protein detection was 83. 54% obviously higher than HBeAg 66. 83%( P〈0. 05). Conclusion Pre- S1 protein and HBV serum marker detection both can reflect HBV replication,but pre- S1 protein detection has higher sensitivity and accuracy. Combination of the 2 methods can provide more objective diagnostic and treatment evidences for HBV patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43