检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨文晔[1,2] 刘云[1,2] 韩冰[3,2] 刘蕊[4,2]
机构地区:[1]第四军医大学口腔医学院预防科,陕西西安710032 [2]第四军医大学口腔医学院军事口腔医学国家重点实验室,陕西西安710032 [3]第四军医大学口腔医学院牙体牙髓病科,陕西西安710032 [4]第四军医大学口腔医学院护理部,陕西西安710032
出 处:《中国美容医学》2014年第17期1468-1470,共3页Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine
摘 要:目的:对比分析在窝沟封闭术操作过程中四手操作和医生独立操作对工作效率和疗效的影响.方法:将229名7~9岁儿童458例无龋病的下颌第一恒磨牙随机分为四手操作组和医生独立操作组进行窝沟封闭治疗,1年后复查比较工作效率和封闭剂脱落率,并进行相关统计学分析.结果:两组工作效率和封闭剂脱落率之间存在显著统计学差异.结论:四手操作技术可以缩短患者治疗时间,提高工作效率,降低封闭剂脱落率.Objective To compare the working efficiency and curative effect between the four-handed technique and independent operate during pit and fissure sealing. Methods 458 mandibular first molars from 229 7 ~9 years old children were divided into four-handed technique group and independent operating group randomly. The working efficiency and curative effect were evaluated and statistically analyzed after 1 year. Results There were significant differences of the working efficiency and curative effect between the two groups. Conclusion The four-handed technique will be helpful with shortening the time of treatment, improving work efficiency and reducing the expulsion rate of sealants.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249