检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:艾尔肯[1]
机构地区:[1]辽宁师范大学法学院
出 处:《医学与法学》2014年第5期5-12,共8页Medicine and Jurisprudence
基 金:四川医事卫生法治研究中心立项资助项目"医疗纠纷第三方调解机制研究"(项目编号:YF12-Z01)的阶段性成果
摘 要:医疗纠纷第三方调解作为新的解决医疗纠纷的途径,与行政调解、诉讼等传统医疗纠纷解决方式相比,具有很强的社会公信力,且程序简单、服务免费、周期短,体现合法性与合理性原则,符合医患双方的利益需求,经司法确认后的调解协议具有法律执行的效力,节约行政管理成本和司法成本等制度优势。在实践中运用这种新型调解方式引导当事人在法律框架下解决医疗纠纷,对减少和缓和医患矛盾,依法保护医患双方的合法权益,将发挥其他纠纷解决机制无法替代的作用。The third-party mediation system of medical disputes, as a new solution to medical disputes, com- pared with administrative mediation, litigation and other traditional medical modes of dispute solution, carries the characteristics of strong social credibility, simple program, free service, and short cycle. It embodies the principles of legality and rationality, and meets the interests and needs for both doctors and patients. The mediation agree- ment, being confirmed by the judiciary, has an effect on law enforcement, and saves administrative and judicial cost. By using this new type of mediation in practice to guide the parties of doctors and patients to solve disputes within the legal framework, it will be irreplaceable in reducing and alleviating doctor-patient conflicts and pro- tecting the legitimate rights and interests of both parties.
分 类 号:D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.22.238