检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周卫[1]
出 处:《南京工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2014年第3期6-12,共7页Journal of Nanjing Tech University:Social Science Edition
基 金:教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(13JJD820009);教育部人文社科规划青年项目(09YJC820074);深圳大学人文社科"青年冲高"项目(09QNCG03)
摘 要:2014年《环境保护法》修订案确认了保护优先原则,但这并不意味着修订案鼓励不计代价的环境保护优先。国内外的环境法实践表明,极端化保护优先原则容易遮蔽环境问题的复杂性,不恰当地缩减行政机关的裁量余地。因此,实现保护优先原则,一要考虑协调发展理念的制约,警惕极端化环境优先价值;二要考虑在具体保护领域通过具体规定实施;三要考虑对地区竞争的影响。此外,还需进一步探讨其排除适用的例外情形。Amendment of Environmental Protection Law in 2014 confirmed the principle of conservation priority. However, that principle did not suggest protecting environment at all costs. Foreign and domestic practice indi- cate that absolute priority of environmental protection may defect effectiveness of law, especially in'the following aspects: the complexity of environmental problems might be ignored and the agencies' discretion power is reduced improperly. Therefore, to implement the principle of priority, one should first take into account the restric- tions to harmonious development and avoid valuing environmental priority extremely; then consider how to imple- ment the principle through explicit provisions in some specific areas. Also, one should consider its impacts on re- gional competition. At last. narticular exceptions should also be explored.
关 键 词:《环境保护法》修订案 保护优先原则 环境利益 环境价值
分 类 号:D922.68[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15