检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张宝[1]
出 处:《南京工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2014年第3期35-43,共9页Journal of Nanjing Tech University:Social Science Edition
基 金:湖南省软科学研究项目(2014ZK3076)
摘 要:我国现行以行政区划为基础、以部门分权为特色、以达标排放为核心的环境规制权配置,实际上是建立在经典科学还原论和决定论图景之上,难以契合环境健康问题所具有的风险与不确定特色,导致环境健康规制处于高度碎片化状态。《环境保护法》修订案第三十九条对此做出了回应,初步体现了健康优先、风险转向与整合取向的特点,标志着我国由基于污染防治的环境规制向基于健康保护的环境规制过渡。但由于该条仅是环境健康规制的纲领性条款,有必要通过专门立法予以具体化;在未进行专门立法之前,应通过对《环境保护法》修订案的体系解释推动该项工作。China' s environmental regulation authority is allocated according to tlae current adminstrative division, with meeting discharge standards as the goal. It is based on classical reductionism and determinism, which can barely live up to the health protection objective. The regulations put the health priority in ground of fragmentation. Article 39 of Amendment of Environmental Protection Law responds to such a dilemma and initially manifests health priority, steering risks and integrating resources, marking the shift of priority in China's envi- ronmental regulations from pollution prevention to health protection. Since it serves only as the guideline of China's environmental regulations with health priority, it is necessary to pass a special legislation. Before the special legislation being established, we should promote the job with a systematic interpretation to the Amendment of Environmental Protection Law.
关 键 词:《环境保护法》修订案 环境健康规制 健康风险评价
分 类 号:D922.68[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249