检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨安山[1,2]
机构地区:[1]武汉大学法学院,湖北武汉430072 [2]新加坡立杰律师事务所驻上海代表处,上海200021
出 处:《中国海商法研究》2014年第3期78-83,共6页Chinese Journal of Maritime Law
摘 要:仲裁协议的效力由其所适用的法律决定,不同国家或地区的法律在认定仲裁协议的法律效力时所采取的标准亦有所区别。从新加坡有关仲裁协议的成文法规范出发,结合新加坡法院就仲裁协议法律效力争议所作的判例,在研究新加坡法院对"病理性仲裁协议"效力认定时所采取的基本原则后,认为新加坡法律具有"亲仲裁"特性。这是新加坡在国际商事仲裁和国际海事仲裁领域取得令人瞩目发展成果的重要原因之一。The effectiveness of an arbitration agreement is determined by its governing law. The law of different countries or regions usually applies different criteria when finding the legal effectiveness of an arbitration agreement. By introducing Sin- gapore' s statutory provisions relating to the arbitration agreement and the cases of the disputes on the legal effectiveness of an arbitration agreement made by Singapore courts, and after studying on the basic principle used by Singapore courts to find the legal effectiveness of a "pathological arbitration agreement", this paper views that the Singapore law has the characteristic of "pro-arbitration" which is one of the crucial reasons that Singapore makes a great development on the international commercial arbitration and international maritime arbitration.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222