检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李学军[1] 张玉萍[2] 金月萍[1] 陈亮亮[1] 吴婧[1] 刘礼梅[1] 孙建[1] 储浩然[1] 龙小娜[1]
机构地区:[1]安徽中医药大学第二附属医院 [2]安徽中医药大学
出 处:《山西中医》2014年第10期28-30,共3页Shanxi Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基 金:安徽省卫生厅中医药科研课题项目计划(编号:2012zy36)
摘 要:目的:观察不同针刺强度对功能性消化不良(FD)的临床疗效差异。方法:将120例功能性消化不良患者随机分为弱刺激组、中刺激组和强刺激组各40例,分别在足三里、中脘、内关三穴进行不同针刺强度的治疗,治疗4周。结果:强刺激组总有效率为70.00%(95%CI=55.80%~84.20%);中刺激组总有效率90.00%(95%CI=75.98%~97.18%);弱刺激组为52.50%(95%CI=37.02%~67.48%);3组综合疗效比较(χ^2=11.766 2,P〈0.01),差异有显著性意义;B组与C组比较(|R2-R3|=0.221 3〉0.160 2,P〈0.05);总体症状积分参数比较,B组优于C组(P〈0.01);主症状积分参数比较,B组优于A组、C组(P〈0.01);胃动素参数比较,B组优于A组、C组(P〈0.01)。结论:中等刺激强度优于强刺激组的证据尚不够充分,而优于弱刺激的证据明显,其收益为OR=0.12(95%CI=0.04~0.41),NNT=3(95%CI=1.74~5.66)。Objective: To observe the differences of clinical efficacy treating the functional dyspepsia(FD)with different intensity of acupuncture.Methods: 120 patients with functional dyspepsia were randomly divided into weak acupuncture group,medium acupuncture group and strong acupuncture group,with 40 patients in each group,which were treated respectively with different intensity of acupuncture at three acupoints of zu shanli,zhong wan and nei guan for 4 weeks.Results : The total effective rate of strong acupuncture group was 70.00%(95% CI= 55.80%~ 84.20%); medium acupuncture group 90.00%(95% CI=75.98%~ 97.18%); weak acupuncture group 52.50%(95% CI=37.02%~ 67.48%); comprehensively compared the efficacies of three groups(χ^2= 11.766 2,P〈0.01),the differences had marked significance; compared group B with group C(| R2-R3|= 0.221 3〉 0.160 2,P〈0.05); compared the parameters of overall symptom scores,group B was better than group C(P〈0.01); compaerd the parameters of main symptom scores,group B was better than group A,group C(P〈0.01); compared the motilin parameters ,group B was better than group A,group C(P〈0.01).Conclusions: The evidence that medium intensity of acupuncture is better than strong acupuncture group is still insufficient,but the evidence that it is better than weak acupuncture is obvious,its benefits are OR=0.12(95% CI=0.04~ 0.41),NNT=3(95% CI=1.74~ 5.66).
关 键 词:功能性消化不良 不同刺激强度 血清胃动素 针刺疗法
分 类 号:R256.3[医药卫生—中医内科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117