依照国际法院判例论证中国南海岛屿主权:方式与问题  

Justifying China's Sovereignty over the Islands of South China Sea by Practices of International Justice: Model and Problems

作　　者：王子昌[1] 

机构地区：[1]暨南大学国际关系学院,广州510630

出　　处：《东南亚研究》2014年第5期45-50,共6页Southeast Asian Studies

基　　金：中国海洋发展研究中心2012年重点课题"南海权益各声索方主张的历史;地理与法理依据研究"(AOC-ZD20120)

摘　　要：格雷格·奥斯丁仿照国际法院的判例,把西沙群岛和南沙群岛的主权问题分开分析和叙述,并以关键日期为分界线,评述各方的主权依据,得出中国拥有西沙群岛和南沙群岛主权的最终结论。这一分析和论证方式,既可以避开或化解中国在南沙岛屿主权问题上的一些不利的证据,为中国的南海岛屿主权提供强有力的法理支撑,同时也为我们以后的南海问题研究指出了需要进一步重点研究的方向,值得我们借鉴。Greg Austin, in his analyses on the disputes about sovereignty of the islands of South China Sea, treats the Paracel Islands and the Spratly Islands separately, and choose a key date to evaluate the evidences of the disputants on each of them and concludes that China has stronger evidence than others to claim the sovereignty over the islands of South China Sea. This analyses not only defuse the detrimental effects of some claims China＇s governments had made before, but also suggest us some key points in the related studies.

关 键 词：南海 岛屿主权 论证方式 关键日期 

分 类 号：D833.1[政治法律—政治学]