对欧产品贸易争端处理的法律依据及解决途径  

Legal Grounds and Solutions for Trade Disputes Between China and EU

作　　者：郭剑萍[1] 

机构地区：[1]西安交通大学法学院,西安710049

出　　处：《西北农林科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2014年第6期156-160,共5页Journal of Northwest A&F University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目(14AZD052)

摘　　要：随着越来越多的我国农产品等销往欧洲,国际贸易争端也随之增加。而欧盟法律体系与我国截然不同,因此了解欧盟法律如何处理贸易争端显得尤为重要。欧洲法律包括欧盟国家间签订的条例、各国国内法,而如何在两者之间寻求处理贸易争端的法律依据及解决途径,保护我国对欧进出口法人值得深入探讨。据此,本文讨论了在对欧贸易案件中,当欧盟《布鲁塞尔1号条例》适用时,英国法院是否可依据不方便法院原则中止审判的各种情形。Since more and more Chinese farm products export to EU,trade related disputes rise at the same time.However,the legal frameworks in EU and China are different,so it is necessary for Chinese exporters to get to know how to deal with disputes by EU laws.EU laws include Regulations sighed by member countries and their domestic laws,and how to keep balance between them is a controversial issue,for example,the relationship between Brussels I Regulation and the doctrine of forum non conveniens.This essay focuses on the situations when English Courts can stay its proceedings on forum non conveniens ground when Brussels I Regulation applies.

关 键 词：农产品贸易争端 英国法院 不方便法院原则 欧盟布鲁塞尔1号条例 

分 类 号：DF415[政治法律—经济法学]