检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]兰州大学,兰州730000
出 处:《电子科技大学学报(社科版)》2014年第5期12-19,共8页Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:国家自然科学基金重点项目"政府职能转变背景下绩效管理研究"(71433005);国家自然科学基金面上项目"基于公共价值的政府绩效结构;生成机制及中国情境下的实证研究"(71373107)
摘 要:作为当今公共政策研究领域最炙手可热的理论模型之一,约翰·金登的多源流分析理论业已得到国内外学者的广泛应用与认可。在对该模型的相关内容进行简单铺陈后,通过辨析国内外不同的政策主体参与逻辑,进一步厘清了我国公共决策的独有特征。研究重点是在整合提炼西方既有修正思路的基础上,沿袭模型的模糊性假设,结合我国具体实践案例,对多源流模型进行优化与补充。研究表明,中国决策情境下的多源流模型优化主要有提高源流间的融合性、政治源流的核心化、焦点事件的独立化以及特殊情况下的临时决策等四种路径,四种优化与补充路径的有机结合将为进一步提升模型适用性提供帮助。The multiple streams model proposed by John W.Kingdon is one of the most popular theories in policy research field, and has been acknowledged and applied comprehensively by scholars. This paper introduces the content of the model first, and then clarifies the specific characteristics of Chinese public decision by comparing and analyzing the difference in subjects’ participation logics between China and other countries. The key point of this research is optimizing the model combined with Chinese specific cases on the basis of western modifying idea. This research shows that there are four main optimizing paths including improving the integration of streams, emphasizing the central role of political streams, separating the focusing events, and temporary decision making in special circumstances, and the combination of these four paths will be helpful for further improving the model applicability.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28