检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张海荣[1]
机构地区:[1]铁道第三勘察设计院集团有限公司,天津300142
出 处:《铁道标准设计》2014年第11期89-94,共6页Railway Standard Design
摘 要:在某国际铁路钢桁梁桥设计过程中,对中、俄两国现行桥梁设计规范计算结果进行对比,同时,采用中国试行极限状态法规范进行试算,比较3种规范的差异性和计算结果的安全储备。中国两种规范设计结果安全储备相差不大,而与俄方规范相比,不同检算项目相差较大,俄方规范对压杆强度控制更为严格,中国规范对疲劳强度控制更为严格。In an international railway steel truss bridge design, both Chinese and Russian design code were employed, and the Chinese Interim code for limit state design was also used. The comparison of the differences and calculation results of the three codes show that two Chinese design results are similar in safety reservation. While the comparison with Russian specification shows that the results are much different for different item. For the strength of compression bar, Russian code is tighter, while, for the fatigue strength of tension bar, Chinese code is stricter.
分 类 号:U442.51[建筑科学—桥梁与隧道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15