检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]扬州大学法学院,江苏扬州225127 [2]扬州市邗江区人民检察院,江苏扬州225002
出 处:《扬州大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2014年第4期37-42,共6页Journal of Yangzhou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:教育部人文社科基金项目(11YJA820027)
摘 要:传统民法将多层公寓的权利结构解构为"建筑物区分所有权中的共有权和专有权",这样的解构没有"小区物业共有权和专有权"来得准确、简洁。既有的对小区物业共有权的定性,都无法准确解释和处理小区物业共有权中的财产关系,因而不具有合理性。小区物业共有权的平等性、完整性、开放性、民主性和客体的永不分割性,与集合共有具有高度的契合性。将小区物业共有权定性为集合共有,既符合学理又符合现代社会生活之实际需要。In Chinese traditional civil law, the right structure of multilayer flats is interpreted as "the common ownership and exclusive right of owners' partitioned ownership of building areas," which is less accurate and succinct than "the collective co-ownership and exclusive right of residence property. " The existing definition of the nature of the co-ownership of residence property can not interpret and deal with the property relations in the co-ownership of residence property. The co-ownership of residence property features equality, completion, compatihle with collective co-ownership. openness, democracy and indivisibility, which is highly
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145