检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蔡养军[1]
出 处:《扬州大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2014年第4期43-50,共8页Journal of Yangzhou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:教育部人文社科项目(11YJA820027)
摘 要:共同共有在古代社会普遍存在,它植根于传统农业社会的生产条件,依靠团体本位的思想观念而发展壮大。早期罗马法同样存在共同共有。古典法时期的罗马法只认可按份共有的法律地位。日耳曼法确立了典型的共同共有类型,为德国、瑞士民法所继受。基于相似的历史条件,共同共有在我国民法中也占有一席之地。然而,伴随现代工商业快速发展和个人本位民法理念的深入人心,共同共有制度正在走向衰微。Common co-ownership is widespread in ancient society. It is rooted in the production conditions "in traditional agricultural society and develops on the basis of community-based ideology. It can also be found in early Roman law. While classical Roman law only admits co-ownership by shares, Germanic law establishes the position of common co-ownership, which is inherited by the civil laws in Germany and Switzerland Due to similar historical conditions, common co-ownership occupies a position in Chinese civil law. However, with the rapid development of modern industry and commerce and the formation of the individual-based civil law, common co-ownership is on the wane.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117