射频微波治疗与传统治疗鼻腔出血的临床护理疗效比较  

The comparison of nursing efficiency in radio frequency microwave treatment and conventional treatment of epistaxis

作　　者：向艳[1] 张仑[2] 吴志琴[1] 张华[3] 

机构地区：[1]新疆医科大学第一附属医院门诊外科,乌鲁木齐830054 [2]新疆医科大学第一附属医院肿瘤二科,乌鲁木齐830054 [3]新疆医科大学第一附属医院耳鼻喉科,乌鲁木齐830054

出　　处：《新疆医科大学学报》2014年第11期1538-1539,1541,共3页Journal of Xinjiang Medical University

基　　金：国家自然科学基金(30860310)

摘　　要：目的探讨射频微波治疗与传统治疗鼻腔出血的临床疗效。方法选取2012年10月-2013年10月新疆医科大学第一附属医院耳鼻喉门诊收治的鼻腔出血患者66例,随机分为对照组与观察组。对照组患者32例,采用常规止血措施以及常规护理;观察组患者34例,采用射频微波治疗以及相应的护理干预。比较两组患者的出血改善及复发情况。结果对照组患者出血改善率为68.8%,出血复发率为46.9%;观察组患者出血改善率为97.1%,出血复发率为8.8%,两组差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对于鼻腔出血的患者,分析其出血原因并有针对性地采用射频微波治疗的方法和相应的护理措施,可以使出血情况得到很好的改善,复发率极低。Objective To analyze the efficiency between RF microwave treatment and traditional treatment of epistaxis.Methods 66 patients with epistaxis treated in the ENT Outpatient Surgery of The First Affil-iated Hospital between October 2012 to October 2013 were randomly divided into control group （32）and observation group（34）.Patients in the control group were managed by routine treatment while patients in the observation group underwent RF microwave treatment.We compared the effect of treatment on the two groups.Results The rate of improvement in the control group was about 68.8%;the rate of recur-rence was about 46.9%.The rate of improvement in the observation group was about 97.1%,the percent-age of recurrence was about 8.8%.The difference was statistically significant （P〈0.05）.Conclusion It is important to analyze the causes of epistaxis and to take appropriate treatment and nursing method.RF（ra-dio frequency）microwave treatment is very good for improvement and its recurrence rate is extremely low.

关 键 词：射频微波治疗 鼻腔出血 原因分析 护理对策 

分 类 号：R454.1[医药卫生—治疗学]