论环境民事公益诉讼的责任承担方式  

Assumption of Responsibility in Environmental Public Interest Civil litigation

作　　者：张辉[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽大学法学院,安徽合肥230601

出　　处：《法学论坛》2014年第6期58-67,共10页Legal Forum

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目<民事赔偿责任优先原则的实现机制研究>(11BFX029)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：环境民事公益诉讼所特有的公益性、预防与补救功能、惩罚性决定了不能直接套用传统普通环境侵权诉讼的责任承担方式,而应当设计出符合其自身性质的法律责任承担方式。以环境民事公益诉讼的核心特征为基础,在环境民事公益诉讼责任承担方式中,排除危害责任适用的核心问题是环境侵害标准的确定与禁止令的适用;恢复原状责任的适用应当考虑恢复原状的可能性与成本问题、"原状"的标准、环境修复方案的制定、恢复原状费用的范围、数额计算和支付方式;赔偿损失责任应当区分具体情况在一定程度上适用。The characters of environmental public interest civil litigation is non - profit, preventive, compensative, and punitive. Those characters determine that traditional liability assumption can not be directly applied to environmental public interest civil litigation, and the liability approach should be designed in a manner consistent with its own nature. Regarding different methods of assumption of responsibility, based on core features of environmental public interest civil litigation, the core issue of removing endangerment is the identification of environmental violations and restraining orders. The application of restitution shall consider the possibility and cost of restoring the original condition, the standard of ＂the status quo＂, the design of environmental restoration program and the range, calculation and payment of restitution cost. The liability to damages should be applied to a certain extent in the basis of specific circumstances.

关 键 词：环境民事公益诉讼 排除危害 恢复原状 赔偿损失 

分 类 号：D912.6[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]