海内外对孔子学院研究的现状分析  

Traveling on Parallel Tracks: A Review on Studies of Confucius Institute

作　　者：安然[1] 魏先鹏[1] 许萌萌[2] 刘程[1] 

机构地区：[1]华南理工大学国际教育学院 [2]华南理工大学新闻与传播学院

出　　处：《学术研究》2014年第11期129-136,160,共8页Academic Research

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"孔子学院跨文化传播影响力研究"(12BXW035);教育部人文社科基金项目"孔子学院中方教师的跨文化适应和传播能力研究"(11YJA860001)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：随着全球孔子学院数量的快速增长,海内外相关研究也越来越多。本文梳理了国内外研究孔子学院的相关成果,发现孔子学院的海外研究与国内研究处在双轨道行驶的状态:国外研究特别重视孔子学院的政治、经济和文化影响,意识形态色彩浓郁;而国内研究则多重视孔子学院自身的建设与发展。由于国家立场的不同和意识形态的差异,国外学者多关注孔子学院的外部影响力,而国内学者多关注孔子学院的自身发展和自身影响力,二者形成了鲜明对比,彼此缺少理解与交融。此外,国内外研究都在研究方法的严谨性上需要加强,国内研究在内容上有待突破,深度和延续性上有待提高,研究队伍有待壮大。As the rapid development of Confucius Institutes(CI), the research of CI is becoming more and more obvious. This review categorizes the studies of CI at China 's mainland and abroad. This paper finds that the research of overseas and domestic on CI are at the parallel tracks. Political, economic and cultural influence on CI are the focus of the overseas research, while the domestic research attach more importance to its self-devel-opment. As the differences of national attitude, target and ideology, foreign scholars pay more attention to its ex-ternal influence, while domestic scholars focus more on self-development and its internal influence. Both travel on parallel tracks without meeting a point. Besides, the domestic abroad studies of CI all should pay more at-tention to the research method. For the domestic study of CI, we need a breakthrough on study content and depth, and a stronger team.

关 键 词：孔子学院 对比分析 文献综述 

分 类 号：G648[文化科学—高等教育学]