检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]潍坊市疾病预防控制中心职业病科,山东潍坊261061
出 处:《中国卫生工程学》2014年第5期380-382,共3页Chinese Journal of Public Health Engineering
摘 要:目的分析测定某浸胶手套生产项目职业病危害因素,评价作业人员的接触剂量及职业病防护设施的控制效果。方法采用现场调查的方式进行职业病危害因素的分析与识别,按有关工作场所职业病危害因素检测的国家标准进行现场定量检测。结果浸胶手套生产行业使用大量化学辅料,存在苯、甲苯、二甲苯、甲醇、乙酸等职业病危害因素。苯、甲醇、乙酸短时间接触浓度分别达404.1 mg/m3、186.5 mg/m3、45.5 mg/m3,苯、甲醇、乙酸时间加权平均接触浓度分别达212.2 mg/m3、76.4 mg/m3、29.2 mg/m3。结论工作场所化学毒物超标原因主要是未采取密闭排风措施,原料采购把关不严,职业卫生管理机构与制度不完善。Objective To determine occupational hazards of a dipped gloves production project, evaluate exposure dose of operating personnel and the control effect of occupation disease prevention facilities. Methods The method of field investigation was used to analyze and recognize the occupational risk factors, according to the national standards for detection of occupational risk factors at the workplace to the on - site detection. Results Occupational risk factors were benzene, tolu- ene, xylene, methanol and acetic acid. The STELs of benzene, methanol and acetic acid were 404. 1,186. 5 and 45.5 mg/ m^3 respectively, the TWAs of benzene, methanol and acetic acid were 212. 2,76. 4 and 29. 2 mg/m^3respectively. Conclusion The main reason of workplace chemicals exceeding the standard hazard is without adopting sealing ventilation measures, procurement of raw materials is not strict, occupational health management institutions and the system are not perfect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15