检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:仲帅[1]
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨工程大学思政教研部,黑龙江哈尔滨150001
出 处:《重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版)》2014年第6期156-160,共5页Journal of Chongqing Technology and Business University:Social Science Edition
基 金:黑龙江省高校人文社会科学重点研究基地项目(HEUSZB1406);哈尔滨工程大学中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目(HEUSZB2206)
摘 要:布哈林和葛兰西都是共产党的领导人和马克思主义理论家,都曾在共产国际工作过,两人自然在文化领导权问题上有相似或相同的地方。布哈林和葛兰西所处的历史境遇不同,承担的历史使命不同,两人自然对文化领导权的具体思考和主张也不尽相同。这种认识的差异主要体现在取得文化领导权的具体方法上。对布哈林和葛兰西的文化领导权思想进行比较,有助于深入探究文化领导权的核心问题,反思中国意识形态建设的历史经验。Both Bukharin and Gramsci are the leaders of the Communist Party and Marxist theorists, ever worked in the Commu-nist International, so they have similar or the same altitude towards cultural leadership. Bukharin and Gramsci had different his-torical circumstances and took different historic missions, so their concrete reflection and opinions on the cultural leadership are not completely the same. This recognized difference is mainly embodied in the real methods to obtain the cultural leadership. The comparison of the ideology of cultural leadership between Bukharin and Gramsci helps to study the core problem of the cultural leadership and to rethink the historical experiences in Chinese ideological construction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28