检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄立嵩[1] 陈瑞丰[1] 单毅[1] 郑吉波[1] 贾亿卿[1]
机构地区:[1]海军总医院急诊科,北京100048
出 处:《临床军医杂志》2014年第10期1037-1038,1044,共3页Clinical Journal of Medical Officers
摘 要:目的探讨优拓油纱对犬咬伤创面的治疗效果。方法选取240例犬咬伤致皮肤贯穿需清创缝合的患者,随机分为A组(对照组)和B组(试验组)各120例。A组伤口经清创缝合术后采用传统凡士林油纱引流,B组伤口经清创缝合术后采用优拓油纱引流。观察创面感染率,比较更换引流物的次数和创面愈合时间。结果与A组的治疗方法相比,B组患者的伤口感染率明显降低,引流物的更换次数明显减少,且伤口的愈合时间明显缩短,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论优拓油纱较传统的犬咬伤伤口引流物能够加速犬咬伤创面愈合,提高治愈率。Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of URGO Lipido-Colloid in the management of dog bite wounds. Methods A total of 240 patients with dog bite wounds, who needed debridement and suture, were divided into two groups at random. Group A (control group) was treated with traditional vaseline gauze to drain after debridement and suture, and Group B (trial group) with URGO Lipido-Colloid (120 cases in each group). The wound infection rate, the required interval between dressing changes and wound healing time were observed and compared between the two groups. Results Group B showed lower wound infection rate, longer dressing change interval and shorter healing time than Group A ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion URGO Lipido- Colloid can effectively promote the healing of wound infection and increase the cure rate after dog bite.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.221.113.108