牛顿抑或奥尔特加?--一项来自高被引文献和获奖者视角的实证研究  

Newton or Ortega?——An Empirical Study from the Perspective of High-cited Papers and Owner of Prizes

作　　者：姜春林[1] 张立伟[1] 刘学[1] 

机构地区：[1]大连理工大学公共管理与法学学院WISE Lab,辽宁大连116024

出　　处：《自然辩证法研究》2014年第11期79-85,共7页Studies in Dialectics of Nature

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“人文社会科学评价中同行评议与科学计量相结合的机理分析与对策研究”(11BTQ21);“ISTIC-ELSEVIER期刊评价研究中心开放基金”资助(项目名称:低被引对高被引作者贡献的实证研究和机理分析--“N-O”假设成立吗?)

摘　　要：牛顿认为,"我看得比别人更远,那是因为我站在巨人的肩上"。而奥尔特加认为,随着社会大众群体的崛起,社会大众将成为社会的主流群体。那么,在学术研究领域,是社会大众还是"巨人"(学术精英)构成科学研究的中坚力量,并引导了学科的发展?本文以社会科学领域的图书情报学和工程技术领域的纳米技术为例,分别采集图书情报学和纳米技术领域的高被引文献数据,以及图书情报学和纳米技术领域的学术精英(图书情报学的5位普赖斯奖获得者和纳米技术领域的5位诺贝尔奖获得者)——获奖者所发表的文献数据。然后,通过检索选取文献的参考文献的被引次数数据得出如下结论:第一,高被引文献引用了更多的高被引文献;第二,学术精英也偏向引用高被引文献。研究结论支持了牛顿假说。Newton indicated that ＂If I have been able to see further, it was only because I stood on the shoulders of giants＂. While Ortega pointed out that with the development of the social public, the public will become the mainstream of the social. Therefore, in the field of academic research, whether social public or the elites take the dominant role in the social who lead the development of the discipline？ This paper takes the example of Library and Infor- mation Science in the social sciences field and Nano in the engineering technology field, collects data of highly cited papers in both filed and the data of published papers from the academic elites in both fields （five Price Prize owners in the Library and Information Science and five Nobel prize owners in Nano）. Then, with the analysis of the collected data, we got the following results： firstly, highly cited papers cite much more highly cited papers; secondly, the academic elites would like to cite the papers with highly cited numbers. The above proves the hypothesis of Newton, which is ＂stand on the shoulders of giants＂.

关 键 词：牛顿 奥尔特加 高被引文献 学术精英 

分 类 号：G306[文化科学]