检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:范文舟[1]
出 处:《河北法学》2014年第9期93-98,共6页Hebei Law Science
摘 要:不论从TRIPs的最低保护标准看,还是从其例外规定看,WTO的药品知识产权保护对健康权影响都具有必然性。因此应建立健康权影响评估机制,要求国家必须评估药品知识产权政策是否限制健康权,及可能受到侵犯的健康权内容为何,评估该药品知识产权政策是否能提供达成目的的最小限制手段,国家必须评估在受限的健康权与药品知识产权所欲构筑的社会秩序(包括经济或社会利益的追求)间,是否有适当的权重关系,以及该权重关系是否具有正当性;等等。Whether by minimum standards of protection in TRIPs or by its Exceptions,protection of pharmaceutical intellectual property in WTO impacts necessarily on health rights. And so, evaluation mechanism should be established about the impact on health rights. By this kind of mechanism, WTO members must assess if policies of pharmaceutical intellectual property restrict health rights, and what kind of content of health rights may be exposed to potential invasions, if policies of pharmaceutical intellectual property can provide the least restrictive means for the purpose achieved, if there are the appropriate weights between health rights restricted and social order (including economic or social benefit pursuit) to be constructed, and if the weights are justified;etc.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249