德日刑法中的责任理论及对我国量刑的启示  

The Theory of Responsibility in Criminal Law in Germany and Japan and the Implications to Sentencing in China

作　　者：张苏 

机构地区：[1]北京社会科学院法学研究所,北京100101

出　　处：《河北法学》2014年第9期153-163,共11页Hebei Law Science

摘　　要：德日刑法的责任理论发端于责任概念,历经百年已成为大陆法系刑法的基本原则。责任主义在量刑中具有刑罚限定机能、刑罚均衡机能。责任主义不但被德日《刑法》规定为基本原则,还被《宪法》规定为基本原则。其量刑司法活动通过责任刑(点理论或幅理论)限制目的刑,否定了将人作为工具威慑他人的正当性,并得到大量判例的支撑。我国量刑理论具有滞后性,给实践带来的问题包括:各地《量刑实施细则》不区分责任刑情节与预防刑情节;目的刑随意突破责任刑上限的状况较为常见;司法解释违背责任主义。建议在我国刑法中规定责任主义与责任刑、发布量刑情节分类指导规范、在审判中贯彻责任主义。In Germany and Japan, criminal responsibility theory is originated from the concept of responsibility, after a hundred year, It has become the basic principle of criminal law. Responsibility has a penalty function, penalty balance function defined in sentencing. Responsibility is not only the criminal law provisions of Germany and Japan as the basic principles of ＂ constitution＂. The sentencing judicial activities through the criminal responsibility is to restrict punishment, denied the legitimacy of the tool as a deterrent to others, and a large number of cases of support. China＇s sentencing theory has lagged behind, including practical problems： ＂ sentencing ＂ rules for the implementation of criminal responsibility does not differentiate between plot and prevention; objective punishment at the upper limit of criminal responsibility is common ;Judicial Interpretation against liability doctrine. Recommendations are provided in Chinas criminal law , sentencing guidelines published classification and implement the responsibility in the trial.

关 键 词：责任刑 责任主义 量刑 德日刑法 量刑规范化 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]