集体林区不同类型农户生计资本差异及生计满意度分析  

Analysis on Differences of Livelihood Capitals and Livelihood Satisfaction between Different Types of Farmers in Collective Forest Area

作　　者：陈卓[1] 续竞秦[1,2] 吴伟光[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]浙江农林大学经济管理学院,临安311300 [2]浙江省农民发展研究中心,临安311300

出　　处：《林业经济》2014年第8期36-41,共6页Forestry Economics

基　　金：国家林业局重大调研项目"浙江省集体林区民生监测研究"(编号:ZDWT-2013-13-2);中国农民发展研究中心预研项目"山区农民生计模式比较及其优化途径研究:以浙江省为例"(编号:XNM-Z201205);浙江农林大学人才启动项目"竹林碳汇供给潜力:基于生命周期的实证分析"(编号:2011FR001)

摘　　要：基于浙江省集体林区4县16个村庄192个农户的实地调查数据,选择收入来源结构指标,采用聚类分析方法,分析了不同类型农户生计资本的差异及其对自身生计满意度评价。研究结果表明:(1)集体林区内部农户大致可划分为务工型农户、种植型农户、自营工商型农户、转移支付型农户和多样来源型农户,不同类型农户之间收入水平存在较大差异。(2)生计资本差异是导致收入差距的主要原因,同时不同资本对收入的贡献有明显差异。(3)当前农村居民对自身生计满意度较高,但不同类型农户对生计状况评价仍然存在较大差异。This paper examines the differences of livelihood capitals and livelihood satisfaction between different types of farmers using cluster analysis to group households based on the composition of their net income. The research is based on the investigation data for 192 households located in 16 villages in 4 counties of Zhejiang Collective Forest Area. Results show that： （1） Households in Collective Forest Area can be divided into five groups, that is, non-farm workers, crop-based farmers, business-based workers, households with transfer payment and house- holds with diversified strategies, and there is a significant difference in income between different groups of farmers. （2） The main reason of income gap is the difference in livelihood capitals, and different type of capital has different contribution to their income. （3） In general, rural residents are satisfied with their living conditions in recent years, but the evaluation of living conditions from different groups of households exist obvious disparity.

关 键 词：集体林区 生计资本 生计满意度 熵值法 

分 类 号：F323.6[经济管理—产业经济]