检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:毛启蒙[1]
出 处:《台湾研究集刊》2014年第4期25-34,共10页Taiwan Research Journal
基 金:中国人民大学科学研究基金中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目"比较国家理论与中国国家改造问题研究"(14XNH028)
摘 要:1992年台湾单方面提出"主权及于整个中国"、"治权仅及于台澎金马"的话语表述以来,尽管大陆方面至今从未接受关于"治权"的表述,但"主权"与"治权"的研究确已成为两岸共同关注的领域。本文以二者关系为视角,分析了影响两岸关系的若干政治主张,并重点考察"一中框架"论对处理"主权"与"治权"话语的启示,从而透视两岸关系的发展脉络。In 1992, Taiwan authorities unilaterally proposed the discourse of "its sovereignty over the whole China and jurisdiction over Taiwan, Penghu, Jinmen and Matsu". Ever since then the discourses of "sovereignty" and "jurisdiction" have become a common field of study by the two sides even though the mainland has never accepted the formulation of "jurisdiction". Based on the relations between the two discourses, this paper makes a detailed analysis of some political proposals that have made an impact on the cross-Strait relations, and at the same time, focuses on the investigation into the enlightenment of the discourses under "one China framework" so that a better way could be found for the development of the cross-Strait relations.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222