闻一多和胡适诗学的差异与贡献比较  

A Comparative Analysis of the Difference and Contribution between Wen Yiduo and Hu Shi's Poetic Theory

作　　者：李乐平[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东海洋大学文学院

出　　处：《社会科学》2014年第9期164-172,共9页Journal of Social Sciences

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学基金项目"闻一多与古今中外作家比较研究"(项目编号:11YJA751038)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：闻一多和胡适相同者,仅只作为文学载体的白话入诗,针对旧诗格律的新诗追求。他们更多者则是差异,如对诗之语言俗雅,对诗之节奏,对诗之外在形式要求等均不相同。闻一多的音乐美和建筑美貌似各自独立,却合二为一构成辩证统一关系,即音乐美必然导致建筑美,建筑美则更加音乐美。胡适所尊崇的诗之自然音节和诗体大解放,也存在互为因果关系。强调自然音节就势必导致诗之散文化,进而导致诗体大解放。胡适诗论诗作的历史贡献具有划时代和里程碑价值,但闻一多的诗论更是诗歌历史发展和要求的必然。虽然从整体看闻一多诗作有诸多不完美之处,但相对胡适绝大多数不完美诗作,显然更是超越。Wen Yiduo and Hu Shi have two similarites. One is that they take vernacular peoms as literiture carrier, and the other is that they pursue new poetry which is different from the old poetrical meters. They have more differences, for exmple, their requirements for the language, rythem, and outer forms of poems are different. It seems that the musical beauty and architectural beauty are independent, however, they combine and form the dialectical unification relations, which is that the musical beauty will definitely lead to the architectectual beauty, and the architectual beauty will means more musical beauty. The natural syllables and great liberation of poetic style which are adhered to by Hu Shi have a causal relationship. He emphasizes that the natuality of the syllable will definitely lead to the prosfication of the poem and the liberation of poetic style. The meaning of the poetics of Hu Shi is epock-making and its value is milestonic, while the peotics of Wen Yiduo is definitely inevitable to the development of the poetic development. Athough the poems of Wen Yiduo have much imperfections as a whole, they are obvious better than the overwhelming majority of imperfect poems written by Hu Shi.

关 键 词：闻一多 胡适 比较 

分 类 号：I206.6[文学—中国文学]