刑罚本质的宪法分析  

The Constitution Analysis on the Nature of Punishment

作　　者：范进学[1] 张玉洁[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学凯原法学院,上海200240

出　　处：《法学论坛》2014年第5期40-49,共10页Legal Forum

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目<死刑制度的宪法控制>(12JJD820003)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：既有的关于刑罚本质的报应刑论、目的刑论、折衷论和关系论等理论都未能有效揭示刑罚的本质,根本原因在于对宪法考量的不足。从宪法的角度进行分析,刑罚表现为国家动用全部暴力机器对受刑人权利的剥夺,受刑人在这一关系中处于绝对弱势地位,其合法权利极易受到侵犯,因而刑罚的本质应当是对受刑人基本权利的保障。为了践行和维护这一本质,就需要对制刑权、求刑权、量刑权、行刑权进行宪法控制。Existing about the nature of the punishment theory of retribution penalty,purpose penalty and compromise and relationship theory and other theories have failed to effectively reveal the nature of the punishment,the lack of basic reason is that the constitutional considerations. Analysis from the perspective of the constitution,performance penalty for all countries to use violence machine deprived of rights of the victim,the victim in this relationship in a weak position absolutely,its legal rights are infringed extremely easily,thus the essence of punishment should be the guarantee of basic rights of the victim. In order to practice and maintaining the essence,you need to the system of right of punishment,punishment,the right of sentencing for constitution control power,the execution power.

关 键 词：刑罚本质 宪法 权利保障 宪法控制 

分 类 号：D911[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]