宪法视野下死刑罪名的立法控制  

Legislative Control of the Death Penalty Charges Under the View of the Constitution

作　　者：上官丕亮[1] 

机构地区：[1]苏州大学王健法学院,江苏苏州215006

出　　处：《法学论坛》2014年第5期50-60,共11页Legal Forum

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目<死刑制度的宪法控制>(12JJD820003)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：1979年我国刑法典颁布时的死刑罪名为28个,然而随后不断膨胀,尽管2011年《刑法修正案(八)》取消13个死刑罪名后,死刑罪名总数减至55个,但仍为世界各国之最。从宪法的角度来看,长期以来我国死刑罪名立法控制欠佳的原因主要有三:一是死刑罪名的立法缺乏宪法上生命权条款的约束;二是死刑罪名的立法未遵循宪法所规定的立法权限;三是死刑罪名的立法缺失合宪性审查的监督机制和实践。死刑罪名的立法控制离不开宪法控制,建议通过宪法解释将生命权入宪并在宪法中明确规定对死刑的限制,建议全国人大常委会遵循宪法所规定的立法权限修改刑法逐步减少死刑罪名,建议全国人大及其常委会在对死刑罪名逐一开展合宪性审查的基础上通盘考虑死刑罪名的减少。In 1979,the criminal law had 28 death penalty charges,but then expanding,despite the amendment（ eight） of the criminal law in 2011 canceled 13 death penalty charges,the number of death penalty charges to 55,but is still the world＇s most.From the point of constitution,the death penalty legislation to poor control have three reasons： firstly the death penalty legislation is lack of constraint of constitutional right to life; secondly,the death penalty legislation does not follow the legislative power according to the provisions of the constitution; thirdly,the lack of the constitutional review. The legislation control of death sentence cannot do without the constitutional control. We suggest,put the right to life into the constitution through interpretation and clearly defined the limitation of death penalty in the constitution; the NPC standing committee reduce the charges of death penalty gradually follow the provisions of the constitution; the NPC and its standing committee to consider reduction of death penalty charges based on the constitutional review.

关 键 词：死刑罪名 立法控制 立法变迁 宪法检视 宪法思路 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]