中文护理专业病例对照研究质量的评价  

Comparison of methodological and reporting quality： A systematic review of case-control studies related Chinese nursing field

作　　者：陈玉芳[1] 王媛媛[1] 王娟娟[1] 王泓午[2] 窦昊颖[1] 

机构地区：[1]天津中医药大学护理学院,300193 [2]天津中医药大学中医学院

出　　处：《中国实用护理杂志》2014年第28期1-6,共6页Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing

基　　金：“十二五”天津市普通高等学校本科教学质量与教学改革研究计划重点项目（D03-1011）;天津中医药大学教育教学改革研究课题重点课题（2013JYA014）

摘　　要：目的 对发表在护理核心期刊、护理非核心期刊和综合性医学期刊上的中文护理专业病例对照研究文献的方法学质量和报告质量进行系统评价.方法 计算机检索中文护理专业病例对照研究的文献,并采用Newcastle-Ottawa Scale （NOS）和Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology（STROBE）量表对文献进行方法学和报告质量评价.结果 检索得到3 579篇文献,根据纳入与排除标准共纳入94篇文献;纳入文献的NOS量表评分为（4.86±1.33）分,STROBE量表评分为（16.11±2.41）分;发表在护理核心期刊上、护理非核心期刊上和综合性医学期刊上的病例对照研究的方法学质量和报告质量比较差异无统计学意义.结论 1992年至2013年,在护理核心期刊、护理非核心期刊及综合医学期刊上发表的中文护理专业病例对照研究文献数量呈逐年增长趋势,且文献涉及的研究领域广泛.但这些研究在方法学和报告质量方面存在着不同程度的缺陷.Objective To compare the methodological and reporting quality of case-control studies published in higher impacted nursing periodicals,other nursing journals and compositive medical journals.Methods All nursing specialization and integrative journals in China mainland were searched from the inception till December 2013.The methodological and reporting quality was assessed according to NewcastleOttawa Quality Assessment Scale （NOS） and strengthening the reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Statement （STROBE） respectively.Results The systematic literature search yielded 3 579 publications potentially relevant studies.Then,a total of 94 hteratures met the inclusion criteria were identified.The average score of methodological quality and reporting quality were（4.86±1.33） and （16.11±2.41） respectively.Additionally,there was no significant difference in methodological quality and reporting quality among higher impacted nursing periodical,other nursing journals and compositive medical joumal.Condusions The number of case-control studies in Chinese nursing field revealed an increasing tendency,and these literatures addressed a wide range of research fields.However,most quality of the case-control studies published in China were rela-tively poor,and both methodological and reporting quality should be further improved.

关 键 词：护理 病例对照研究 质量评价 比较研究 

分 类 号：R473[医药卫生—护理学]