检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭燕梅[1] 郑斌芬[2] 陈蔚[1] 瓮长水[1]
机构地区:[1]解放军总医院南楼康复医学科,北京市100853 [2]北京军区空军司令部门诊部,北京市100061
出 处:《中国康复理论与实践》2014年第10期971-974,共4页Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice
摘 要:目的探讨不同的阻力量选择对腰背肌协调性测试结果可信度的影响。方法由1名测试者在1周内分别对30例青年腰痛男子进行2次腰背肌协调性测试。在每次测试中,受试者随机完成5 kg、10 kg和15 kg 3种阻力量的测试,测试内容包括向心运动平均值、向心运动偏移值、离心运动平均值和离心运动偏移值4项。应用组内相关系数(ICC)对3个阻力量组的4项测试结果进行重测信度评价。结果 5 kg阻力量组ICC分别为0.303、0.500、0.358和0.360;10 kg阻力量组ICC分别为0.449、0.382、0.365和0.272;15 kg阻力量组ICC分别为0.453、0.442、0.614和0.411。结论施加15 kg阻力,腰背肌协调性测试具有较好的重测信度。Objective To explore the effect of different resistance amount on the reliability of the lumbar muscles' coordination test.Methods 30 young male adults participated the lumbar muscles' coordination test twice within 1 week by the same tester. In each test, the subjects took 5 kg, 10 kg and 15 kg of resistance randomly. The index included mean of concentric motion, deviation of concentric motion,mean of eccentric motion and deviation of eccentric motion. Intra-class correlation coefficient(ICC) for these 4 test results were applied to evaluate the reliability of those tests. Results The ICCs of the 4 test results were 0.303, 0.500, 0.358 and 0.360 respectively in the 5 kg of resistance group, 0.449, 0.382, 0.365 and 0.272 respectively in the 10 kg of resistance group, and 0.453, 0.442, 0.614 and 0.411 respectively in the 15 kg of resistance group. Conclusion The test-retest reliability can be satisfied in the lumbar muscles' coordination test with 15 kg of resistance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117