检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈春雷[1]
机构地区:[1]池州学院,安徽池州247000
出 处:《阅江学刊》2014年第5期123-129,共7页Yuejiang Academic Journal
基 金:安徽省教育厅人文社会科学研究重点项目"网络舆论危机管理的语用学研究"(SK2013A124)
摘 要:世纪之交出现的汉语危机论,引发了一场关于"汉语危机"命题真伪的激烈争论,并形成肯定与否定两派。综观两派观点,均有合理之处,但也都失之偏颇。肯定派对汉语危机的认识存在理论缺陷与误区;否定派则未能正视语言生活中的问题和汉语危机论的意义与价值,也没有就汉语面临的困境作出建设性的思考。对于"汉语危机"命题真伪之辩的反思,有助于推动我们深入思考汉语的现实处境及应对之策。At the turn of the century the Chinese theory of crisis, has triggered a fierce debate about“Chi-nese language crisis” proposition the authenticity of affirmation and negation, and formed two factions. The both point of views are reasonable, but also are biased. On the one hand, there are some theoretical defects and er-rors in the positive views;on the other hand, the problems of Chinese language life, the meaning and value of the theory about Chinese language crisis are not taken seriously, and constructive thinking is not presented in negative views. Reflection on“Chinese language crisis” the authenticity of the proposition of the debate, helps to promote us to think deeply about Chinese realistic situation and countermeasures.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28