Lichtenstein术在治疗腹股沟疝中的优势  

Lichtenstein technique advantages compared to the traditional surgical treatment of inguinal hernia

作　　者：刘厚生[1] 廖秋[1] 赵勇[1] 

机构地区：[1]江苏省沭阳县中医院普通外科,江苏沭阳223600

出　　处：《首都医科大学学报》2014年第5期660-662,共3页Journal of Capital Medical University

摘　　要：目的总结Lichtenstein术式在治疗腹股沟疝中的临床效果和优势。方法选取沭阳县中医院普通外科2011年01月至2013年12月外科收治的确诊为腹股沟疝患者118例,按数字法随机分为对照组与观察组,两组均59例。给予对照组传统的疝修补术进行治疗,对观察组采用Lichtenstein术式进行疝修补,比较两组患者的手术时间、住院时间、术后下床活动时间及术后尿潴留、切口血肿血清肿、阴囊积液水肿、血肿等并发症发生情况。结果通过比较分析,观察组手术所用时间、住院时间、术后下床活动时间、术后尿潴留、切口血肿血清肿、阴囊积液水肿、血肿等并发症发生情况观察组要低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论采用Lichtenstein术式治疗腹股沟疝相对传统疝修补术具有临床应用优势。Objective Reveals Lichtenstein technique advantages compared to the traditional surgical treatment of inguinal hernia.Methods Select our hospital 118 cases diagnosed from January 2011 to December 2013 surgical admitted for inguinal hernia. Press the number randomly divided into a control group and the observation group,59 cases in each group. The control group received traditional hernia repair treatment. Observation group performed surgical Lichtenstein hernia repair. Two groups were compared operative time,hospital stay,postoperative ambulation and postoperative urinary retention,wound hematoma,scrotal fluid and edema,hematoma and other complications were observed. Results Through comparative analysis, the observation group surgery time, hospital stay,postoperative ambulation time,postoperative urinary retention,wound hematoma,scrotal effusion and edema,hematoma and other complications were lower than the control group,the difference was statistically significance（ P 〈0. 01）. Conclusion Using Lichtenstein inguinal hernia surgical treatment has advantages over traditional hernia repair.

关 键 词：LICHTENSTEIN术式 无张力疝修补术 腹股沟疝 

分 类 号：R615[医药卫生—外科学]