英国城市复兴中社区赋权的“政策悖论”及其借鉴  

Paradox of Community Empowerment of Urban Regeneration Policy in the United Kingdom

作　　者：周晨虹[1] 

机构地区：[1]济南大学政治与公共管理学院,山东济南250022

出　　处：《城市发展研究》2014年第10期92-97,106,共7页Urban Development Studies

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金一般项目"快速城市化背景下城市边缘社区治理研究:社会资本与文化重建"(13YJA840038);济南市社会科学规划项目"社会资本视角下济南市棚户区改造与治理研究"(14CSI18)

摘　　要：20世纪90年代后期以来社区赋权成为英国城市复兴政策与实践的核心要素。但在其实施过程中,社区赋权政策并没有带来预期的实际改变,相反成为政党或利益相关者实现其目的的合法性手段,社区合作伙伴组织的赋权职能也存在着内在的矛盾与局限,这些问题构成了社区赋权的"政策悖论"。梳理西方学者对英国城市复兴中社区赋权政策的实施成效研究,有助于借鉴西方城市治理的经验与教训,以促进我国城市治理中的公民参与。In the late 1990s community empowerment appears to be the core strategy strongly espoused by government for UK regeneration. Many researches about the outcomes of community empowerment have been concerned with the ＂ policy paradox＂ , that community empowerment has not led to genuine community changes in practice that in turn create new problems. The programs became captured to legitimate the parties＇policy agenda or other stakeholders＂ aims, and there are contradictions and constrains between communities and partnerships. Researchers propose the methods and policy refinements which aim to improve empowerment outcomes and assist community participation. These studies could be used for reference to improve community engagement in our urban governance.

关 键 词：英国 城市复兴 社区赋权 政策悖论 

分 类 号：D523.5[政治法律—政治学]