从国际服务贸易摩擦透视自由化谈判的利益差异——兼论中国服务贸易发展的战略选择  

A Study on the Interests Differences of Liberalization Negotiations through International Service Trade Frictions

作　　者：林峰[1] 戴磊 林珊[3] 

机构地区：[1]华南理工大学经济与贸易学院 [2]浦发银行苏州分行 [3]福建社会科学院

出　　处：《亚太经济》2014年第6期44-48,共5页Asia-Pacific Economic Review

基　　金：教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目"要素成本上升背景下我国外贸中长期发展趋势研究"(13JZD010)的资助

摘　　要：本文在对国际服务贸易摩擦的表征与内涵进行提炼的基础上,解析与透视服务贸易自由化谈判的利益差异。结论是:美国、欧盟等发达国家在服务业市场准入谈判中的利益趋同性更强,偏重于推动金融服务、信息服务等知识密集型服务业的市场准入,这种利益取向的差异正是造成国际服务贸易摩擦的重要成因;以中国为代表的发展中国家则偏向于紧急保障机制、自然人流动等议题的谈判,这些矛盾势必会造成服务贸易自由化谈判的僵化。针对以上论述,本文最后提出对中国服务贸易发展战略的政策性启示。This paper analyzes and discusses the interests differences of service trade liberalization negotiations.The paper finds that interests convergence is strengthened in negotiations of service market access among developed countries such as U.S.and EU,who have actively promoted the market access of knowledge-intensive services such as financial services and information services.This interests-oriented difference is the significant factor causing international service trade frictions.China,as well as other developing countries have preferred to the negotiations of emergency safeguard mechanism and presence of natural person.These differences would result in the stagnation of service trade liberalization negotiations.Considering above discussions,this paper raises useful suggestions for the strategies of China＇s service trade developments.

关 键 词：服务贸易摩擦 服务贸易自由化谈判 利益取向 

分 类 号：F752.68[经济管理—国际贸易]