检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西安交通大学经济与金融学院,陕西西安710061
出 处:《当代财经》2014年第11期5-13,共9页Contemporary Finance and Economics
基 金:陕西省软科学重大项目"扩大我国居民消费的财税政策研究"(2014KRM81)
摘 要:将测度我国行业收入差距的泰尔指数按所有制进行分解后发现,由所有制引起的行业收入差距已越来越小,且由于国有部门组内差距偏小,实际上近年来国有参与度对我国行业整体收入差距起到一定的缓解作用。通过选取2003-2012年间19个主要行业的相关数据,分盈利性行业和非盈利性行业进行的研究显示,行业的垄断程度差异是行业收入差距产生的重要因素之一,国有参与度对行业平均收入水平的影响在盈利性行业和非盈利性行业表现截然不同。在此基础上提出了缩小行业差距的改革方向。According to the ownership systems, this paper makes a decomposition of Theil index, which is used to measure China's industry income gap. The results indicate that the industry income gap caused by the ownership has become narrower and narrower; due to the rather smaller income gap of the groups of the state-owned sector, the degree of participation of the state-owned sector has in fact been playing a role in mitigating the overall income gap of China's industries to a certain degree in recent years. By selecting the relative data of the 19 major industries from 2003 to 2012, this study, which is carried out according to the division of profit and nonprofit industries, shows that the different degrees of industrial monopoly is one of the important factors leading to industry income gap. The influence of the participation of the state-owned sector on the industrial average income level plays entirely different roles in the profit industry and nonprofit industry. On such a basis, this study points out the reform direction to narrow the industry gap.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15